NRG Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Duke Energy has a net margin of 8.74% compared to NRG Energy's net margin of 16.72%. NRG Energy's return on equity of 46.41% beat Duke Energy's return on equity of 9.35%.

NRG Energy has a consensus price target of $149.13, signalling downside risk potential of -4.44%. On the other hand Duke Energy has an analysts' consensus of $127.51 which suggests that it could grow by 11.41%. Given that Duke Energy has higher upside potential than NRG Energy, analysts believe Duke Energy is more attractive than NRG Energy.

NRG Energy has a beta of 1.005, which suggesting that the stock is 0.471% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Duke Energy has a beta of 0.395, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 60.548%.

NRG Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.44 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.09%. Duke Energy offers a yield of 3.65% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.05 per share. NRG Energy pays 36% of its earnings as a dividend. Duke Energy pays out 71.02% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

NRG Energy quarterly revenues are $8.6B, which are larger than Duke Energy quarterly revenues of $8.2B. NRG Energy's net income of $750M is lower than Duke Energy's net income of $1.4B. Notably, NRG Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 25.33x while Duke Energy's PE ratio is 18.98x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for NRG Energy is 1.11x versus 2.86x for Duke Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Talen Energy has a net margin of 8.74% compared to NRG Energy's net margin of -21.4%. NRG Energy's return on equity of 46.41% beat Talen Energy's return on equity of 30.01%.

NRG Energy has a consensus price target of $149.13, signalling downside risk potential of -4.44%. On the other hand Talen Energy has an analysts' consensus of $257.90 which suggests that it could grow by 5.47%. Given that Talen Energy has higher upside potential than NRG Energy, analysts believe Talen Energy is more attractive than NRG Energy.

NRG Energy has a beta of 1.005, which suggesting that the stock is 0.471% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Talen Energy has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

NRG Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.44 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.09%. Talen Energy offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. NRG Energy pays 36% of its earnings as a dividend. Talen Energy pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. NRG Energy's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

NRG Energy quarterly revenues are $8.6B, which are larger than Talen Energy quarterly revenues of $631M. NRG Energy's net income of $750M is higher than Talen Energy's net income of -$135M. Notably, NRG Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 25.33x while Talen Energy's PE ratio is 25.39x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for NRG Energy is 1.11x versus 6.19x for Talen Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

TXNM Energy has a net margin of 8.74% compared to NRG Energy's net margin of 1.88%. NRG Energy's return on equity of 46.41% beat TXNM Energy's return on equity of 8.14%.

NRG Energy has a consensus price target of $149.13, signalling downside risk potential of -4.44%. On the other hand TXNM Energy has an analysts' consensus of $58.89 which suggests that it could grow by 4.22%. Given that TXNM Energy has higher upside potential than NRG Energy, analysts believe TXNM Energy is more attractive than NRG Energy.

NRG Energy has a beta of 1.005, which suggesting that the stock is 0.471% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison TXNM Energy has a beta of 0.110, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 88.994%.

NRG Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.44 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.09%. TXNM Energy offers a yield of 2.81% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.41 per share. NRG Energy pays 36% of its earnings as a dividend. TXNM Energy pays out 57.83% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

NRG Energy quarterly revenues are $8.6B, which are larger than TXNM Energy quarterly revenues of $482.8M. NRG Energy's net income of $750M is higher than TXNM Energy's net income of $9.1M. Notably, NRG Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 25.33x while TXNM Energy's PE ratio is 25.12x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for NRG Energy is 1.11x versus 2.56x for TXNM Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Vistra has a net margin of 8.74% compared to NRG Energy's net margin of -6.81%. NRG Energy's return on equity of 46.41% beat Vistra's return on equity of 36.03%.

NRG Energy has a consensus price target of $149.13, signalling downside risk potential of -4.44%. On the other hand Vistra has an analysts' consensus of $166.97 which suggests that it could grow by 2.84%. Given that Vistra has higher upside potential than NRG Energy, analysts believe Vistra is more attractive than NRG Energy.

NRG Energy has a beta of 1.005, which suggesting that the stock is 0.471% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Vistra has a beta of 1.163, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 16.258%.

NRG Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.44 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.09%. Vistra offers a yield of 0.54% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share. NRG Energy pays 36% of its earnings as a dividend. Vistra pays out 17.98% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

NRG Energy quarterly revenues are $8.6B, which are larger than Vistra quarterly revenues of $3.9B. NRG Energy's net income of $750M is higher than Vistra's net income of -$268M. Notably, NRG Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 25.33x while Vistra's PE ratio is 25.53x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for NRG Energy is 1.11x versus 3.12x for Vistra. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.